ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG TODAY
We need you to help protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
Get EWG widgets & blog badges.
ENVIROBLOG TO YOU
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Cell Phone Radiation Blog Series - All In One Place
Rubber Ducky: You're so not the one
Epigenetics hits the mainstream
Cosmetics Safety Series - Part 2: Mind the (data) gap
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Infant formula: How to choose it & use it
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Where can I get that? Online, of course! | Main | BPA: What FDA doesn't know could hurt you »
Fire retardants: Disproportionate risk to small children
We tested 20 mothers and their toddlers for toxic fire retardants and found that the small children typically had three times as much of these hormone-disrupting chemicals in their blood as their mothers - and much higher levels than newborns. Participant Katrina Alcorn responded this way when she learned of her child's blood levels:
Since we did the study, I've become much more aware about what we buy and we're much more on top of the hand washing before meals. It was bad enough to know our levels were high, but it was a shock when we had our furniture tested and found out that the worst culprit was the glider chair that I'd bought to nurse my daughter in when she was a baby. I can't believe it was legal to sell furniture that is essentially poisoning you without you knowing it.
Why are kids levels higher? Not surprisingly, these elevated levels are caused by childhood exposures to household items containing PBDEs, a class of fire retardant added to household furniture and electronic items. Yes, the living room couch, that comfy reading chair, and your laptop where the kids watch videos or type their letters. And it all happens through that childhood habit we all know so well: hands and stuff in the mouth. Kids ingest roughly 10 times more PBDEs than adults from hand-to-mouth contact.
Also not surprisingly, levels are higher in the U.S. because other countries don't require fire retardants and our stringent fire safety standards protect us from potential fires but not from guaranteed chemical toxicity.
Is PBDE exposure a problem? Definitely. PBDEs have been proven to be especially toxic to the developing brain and reproductive system, and the most sensitive periods for adverse effects appear to be late pregnancy and early childhood. Exactly the time their levels are so high. Read more about the risks here.
Is the U.S. doing anything about it? Not so much. There are three types of PBDEs and they are regulated differently. Penta and Octa can no longer be produced in the U.S., but it's legal to import them on products, so exposure is possible on imported furniture. There are no federal restrictions on Deca. Other countries and some U.S. states have banned some or all three types: the E.U., Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands have banned all three, and here in the U.S., 11 states have banned the penta and octa types and two states have banned deca and 10 others have proposed a ban. Time for Congress to step up to the plate, don't you think?
Reducing your exposure. Until PBDEs are no longer allowed in US products, there are several actions you can take to reduce your family's exposure, mainly avoiding electronics and foam furniture with PBDEs - ask when buying, it'll protect you and share consumer concern. Read the report's full recommendations here. You can also take these simple steps:
Read it for yourself. In our full report you'll find more details on our analysis, differences between children and adults that make children uniquely vulnerable to toxic chemicals, government and industry actions to phase out PBDEs, and more.
Watch EWG staffers discuss the findings on The Today Show 9.4.08: http://www.ewg.org/node/27077
What about using plants (cited in the Raising Baby Green book) to remove VOCs out of the air? Would that help mitigate some of the risk?
Do memoryfoam mattresses like the Sealy Tempurpedic mattresses have PBDEs? I sleep on this type of mattress every night. Is there a way for us to test PBDEs in our home?
do these chemicals lose potency over time or do they maintain their toxic level over the years?
Is handwashing with soap required to remove Deca and stop the transfer to mouths? Or do hand sanitizer products work as well?
So many of us moms are using that handy hand santizer in our purses and diaper bags. Is it protecting us? Or should we use soap (also given the potential toxins in many of the soaps, esp. those available at retail/commercial restrooms)?
Thanks,
Sheli Hayes
I live in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. How can I find out about the regulations on these 3 types of PBDEs here. I have 2 small children and one on the way. How do I find out how safe my furniture and toys are from these toxins? It boggles my mind how all these hazardous chemicals are found in practically everything we buy. It's sad and makes you feel like no matter how hard you try to keep your children safe and healthy, it's almost impossible to do so. It's wrong. I can only hope more and more is done for future generations.
Isn't the flannel used to make little kids' pajamas treated with some kind of flame retardant? When I go to the fabric store, many flannels are labeled as unsuitable for children as they are not flame retardant...
Can you comment on the transfer of maternal PBDE's to babies via breastfeeding? Does breastmilk contain PBDE's? Since other contaminants such as PCB's are readily transferred via breastfeeding, I guess that PBDE's are too. If so, what is the risk/benefit analsis of breastfeeding and toxics transfer?
Sleep-ware for children has flame retardants (this is mandated by law)- do these contain DECA? Do you consider them safe?
It's a crime that it made it into kids' clothing in the first place!
Alexa Fleckenstein M.D., physician, author.
A potentially bigger concern is that flame retardants have migrated from your home to the environment. These chemicals become part of your household dust, possibly as the foam in your mattress, couch etc. degrades and falls onto your floors. This contaminated dust then travels or is carried outside and is ingested by livestock.
Flame retardants have been found in significant levels in dairy products. The higher the fat content, such as ice cream and cheddar cheese, the more flame retardants. Guess why I buy low-fat ice cream and European cheese (Europe has banned flame retardants). And yes, it has been found in breastmilk. Check out toxicnation.ca for more tips on reducing your exposure at home.
Sue in Juneau, You'll find info on breastfeeding in the toxics context in this report. In short, we know they are in breast milk and therefore transferred from mother to baby. However, we don't recommend that moms not breastfeed because of this; the benefits are still vital. Read more here in our piece "breast milk is still best": http://www.ewg.org/node/20111
Also, we did a breastmilk report in 2003 that you can read here: http://www.ewg.org/reports/mothersmilk
Hope that helps. Lisa
I am an avid sewer and I would recommend completely avoiding ANY fabrics that say "Flame-retardant" or "non-flammable" on their label. When you go to the fabric store, check the end of the bolt (the cardboard ) for this info. As to children's clothing, you can find sleepwear that is tight-fitting cotton and not flannel. they legally have to market it as "not intended for sleepwear" but use it anyway. Stay away from the flannel stuff.
Sheli: We recently released a report on Triclosan, the anti-bacterial ingredient found in many hand sanitizers (among other common HH products) that you might take a look at: http://www.ewg.org/node/26752.
In short, we recommend that people don't use it (as does the AMA). Soap works just as well w/o the downsides. Also, no-one has studied whether hand sanitizers remove PBDEs. It seems unlikely since they are designed to kill bacteria-and are not washed off.
And yes, washing hands can reduce the transfer of PBDEs (and other chemicals) from hands to mouth, but I recommend reading our additional suggestions for reducing exposure in the "What you Can Do" section of our report: http://www.ewg.org/node/26905. Hope that helps!
Tanay, Great question. PBDEs maintain their toxic level over time. There is also concern that Deca actually becomes more hazardous because it breaks down into more persistent and toxic forms.
Bobby, Any mattresses made before 2006 could have PBDEs in them. Mattresses made after about 2006 are likely PBDE free. There is information in the "What you can do" section of our report that discusses foam: http://www.ewg.org/node/26905.
Susan and Amy L, it is a common misunderstanding that the flame retardants on/in pajamas are the same as these, but in fact the fire retardants in pajama fabric are not PBDEs, so Deca (a type of PBDE) is not a concern for pajamas. For a thorough history and assessment of pajama fire retardants, see The Green Guide's write-up: http://www.thegreenguide.com/doc/ask/pajamas2
Ania, Thanks for asking about Canada. We agree - it boggles our minds, too! In a nutshell, Canada is similar to the US in terms of use and regulation of PBDEs. Canadian lawmakers recently voted to end deca manufacture in Canada, a hollow gesture since the chemical is not made within the country, rather imported inside electronic goods. For more information about Canada see this Environment Canada info on PBDEs: http://www.ec.gc.ca/CEPARegistry/documents/subs_list/PBDE_draft/PBDEfaq.cfm.
My son had one of those Cranium forts and I noticed on a label of the fabric sheets or one of the foam poles said that it was flame retardant. I emailed Hasbro and as I thought they have government specs to follow flame retarding items. They replaced the toy.