ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« A change at the top | Main | FDA's moving goalposts on melamine in infant formula »
Melamine in formula: Another round with the FDA
When the FDA says "there's no reason for any parent to be concerned for any reason," I want to roll my eyes. So when FDA spokesperson Judy Leon said exactly that about its recent discovery of melamine in U.S. Baby formula, I did roll my eyes, albeit briefly.
Then I tried to get to the bottom of this, since I wasn't feeling overly confident that the FDA and manufacturers have got it covered. I'm sure I'm not alone in turning elsewhere for the full, science-based story. The Associated Press' two articles are quite thorough, and as always with breaking news, there are stories cropping up by the hour.
Turns out the Associated Press broke the story by requesting results of formula testing under a Freedom of Information Act request (FOIA). FDA hadn't even told manufacturers about their findings. There are 3 firms involved in this mess (Nestle, Mead, and Abbott), and together they manufacture more than 90 percent of the formula made in the U.S. FDA originally gave the AP incorrect data, but Wednesday's story straightened it out.
Now we know that melamine was detected in Nestle's Good Start Supreme, cyanuric acid (a related chemical) was found in 3 samples of Mead Johnson's Enfamil Lipil with Iron, and Abbott (makers of Similac) told the AP their own tests had turned up some of the chemical.
What is melamine? It's a synthetic chemical with loads of familiar uses when combined with formaldehyde (dry erase boards, dishware, and formica, to name a few). When ingested at toxic levels, melamine can adversely affect kidney health and, as we saw with pets and babies in China, at high enough doses it can kill. Contaminants in formula pose an incredible risk to infants because of their small body size, intense appetites, immature body systems that can't metabolize toxic chemicals, and the fact that a single type of formula can be 100% of their diet.
If there is a silver lining to this situation (I know, I shouldn't mention linings since metal formula can linings still contain BPA, too...), it's that the amounts found are far lower than those found in China. But aside from that, I'm not feeling very grateful for an agency that has so very poorly protected public health in recent years.
At least it's common knowledge that the place needs an overhaul, and soon. Especially since it is contradicting its own prior statements on melamine by suggesting that the trace amounts being found are safe. Less than two months ago it made very clear where it stood on melamine safety, and it doesn't add up:
FDA is currently unable to establish any level of melamine and melamine-related compounds in infant formula that does not raise public health concerns
This change sure makes a parent wonder whether this lifting of the safety levels was due to increased understanding based on science and testing, or if it was conveniently raised because, well, they found some. Based on its abysmal, industry-preferring performance on bisphenol-A, my guess is the latter, but as with so very many toxins, we just don't know. And when it comes to feeding infants formula, not knowing just isn't good enough. So today we sent a letter to U.S. formula manufacturers, with this request:
Your clients have a right to know what your company is doing to identify and eliminate melamine in your infant formula, your strategy for preventing melamine contamination of your products, and how you are monitoring your products for all food additives and trace contaminants.Please tell them what effective and aggressive measures you are taking to fulfill your commitment to every child who consumes your formula.
Agreed?
Another reason to breastfeed as long as possible!
We certainly don't want to give any of these companies our business!
While the appearance of melamine in baby formulas is alarming, it would behoove us, above all, to remain mindful of the larger health issues involved with baby formula products. Like melamine, the vitamins in the typical baby formula are synthetic, being derived from petroleum rather than living food sources. Synthetic vitamins not only provide incomplete nutrition, but they deplete the body over time as it strives to complete the incomplete synthetic vitamin complexes by drawing from the body's own supplies. Further, synthetic vitamins, being inorganic, are difficult for the body to process and create toxins that the liver must work hard to process. Babies' systems are very tender and even less equipped than adults' to handle such stressors. Certainly, it is much wiser to breast feed. Breast milk contains substances uniquely created to fortify the baby's immune system and create solid building blocks of health for its future.