ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper
School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!
Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars
Why do blowouts take so long to fix?
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« In search of safe plastics | Main | The Disappearing Male documents concerning issues »
TSCA? No, thanks. Kid-Safe? Yes, please.
How old were you in 1976? I was 7, the #1 hit song was "Silly Love Songs" by Paul McCartney and Wings, and gas cost 59 cents a gallon. These and most things have changed in the last 32 years, but not our country's toxic chemical regulatory law, the Toxic Substances Control Act, which was passed that year. And it's never been amended. Never. Even though it declared safe some 62,000 chemicals already on the market at the time, despite having little or no data to support the policy. Since that time, another 20,000 chemicals have been put into commerce in the U.S., also with little or no data to support their safety.
Hardly the kind of protection I want for my family, especially during my two pregnancies, when exposures are so very potent. The result? Babies are born pre-polluted with as many as 300 industrial chemicals in their bodies when they enter the world. Our testing has identified 455 chemicals in people and, more astonishing still, no one has any idea if these exposures are safe.
We are at a tipping point, where the pollution in people is increasingly associated with a range of serious diseases and conditions from childhood cancer, to autism, ADHD, learning deficits, infertility, and birth defects. Yet even as our knowledge about the link between chemical exposure and human disease grows, the government has almost no authority to protect people from even the most hazardous chemicals on the market. Under TSCA, the EPA does not have the authority to demand the information it needs to evaluate a chemical's risk, and neither manufacturers nor the EPA are required to prove a chemical's safety as a condition of use.
It's high time that the weakest environmental law on the books is made stronger. The good news is the Kid Safe Chemicals Act, which will change all that. For the better. How? Let me count the ways:
- Kid-Safe requires that industrial chemicals be safe for infants, kids and other vulnerable groups
- Kid-Safe requires that new chemicals be safety tested before they are sold;
- Kid-Safe requires chemical manufacturers to test and prove that the 62,000 chemicals already on the market that have never been tested are safe in order for them to remain in commerce;
- Kid-Safe requires EPA to review "priority" chemicals, those which are found in people, on an expedited schedule;
- Kid-Safe requires regular biomonitoring to determine what chemicals are in people and in what amounts;
- Kid-Safe requires regular updates of health and safety data and provides EPA with clear authority to request additional information and tests;
- Kid-Safe provides incentives for manufacturers to further reduce health hazards;
- Kid-Safe requires EPA to promote safer alternatives and alternatives to animal testing;
- Kid-Safe protects state and local rights; and
- Kid-Safe requires that this information be publicly available.
It's pretty clear that through the Kid-Safe Chemicals Act we can give our children a safer and healthier future. I know that's what I want.
Wanna learn more? Great! We have loads of user-friendly information on our Kid-Safe web page. Including a 1-page fact sheet that clearly compares what is (TSCA) with what could be (Kid-Safe).
Leave a comment