ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG TODAY
We need you to help protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
Get EWG widgets & blog badges.
ENVIROBLOG TO YOU
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Cell Phone Radiation Blog Series - All In One Place
Rubber Ducky: You're so not the one
Epigenetics hits the mainstream
Cosmetics Safety Series - Part 2: Mind the (data) gap
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Infant formula: How to choose it & use it
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Time to say goodbye to Steve | Main | Australians rally for the planet »
FDA Fish Folly
The following is a guest post from EWG Senior Analyst Sonya Lunder.
Ah, December. Season of holiday lights, office parties and weekly announcements of Bush Administration actions to weaken health protections for children.
First, it was melamine in baby formula, now mercury in fish. I for one will definitely welcome 2009 with open arms.
Last week, EWG leaked documents showing that FDA was preparing to declare all fish consumption to be perfectly safe.
FDA claims that the good fats and other nutrients in fish can counteract much or all of mercury's harms. Its model suggests that nearly everyone will benefit from eating at least 2 servings of fish each week.
This outrageous conclusion flies in the face of decades of mercury research and poses a clear danger to children's health. EPA scientists and other have raised serious questions about the details of FDA's proposal and posed the obvious question -- why didn't FDA examine the risks and benefits of specific types of fish?
Since 2004, pregnant women have been advised to limit fish consumption and to avoid species with the highest mercury levels. This guidance is clearly warranted because 1 in 6 of us (moms, or "women of childbearing age," as we are known) already have too much mercury in our bodies. Fish is the primary source of mercury exposure. Getting good fats from low-mercury fish, fish oil or mercury-free foods, such as walnuts, fortified eggs or even margarine, are clearly the safest choices.
Scientists studying mercury toxicity in fish, both in the United States and abroad, acknowledge the benefits of fish eating but steer women toward low-mercury foods. Wild salmon is loaded with good fats, low in mercury and tops the list.
Leave a comment