ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.


Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page
YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper

School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!

Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars

Why do blowouts take so long to fix?

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

Top Blog Award

Top  blogs award

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Santa, please bring me toxin-free fragrance | Main | Mercury in light bulbs »

Phthalates, phthalates everywhere

December 26, 2008

rubber_duck.jpg
Soft plastic toys are often loaded with phthalates.

National Research Council tells EPA: cumulative risk assessment of phthalates and other toxic chemicals is urgently needed

A real victory for both human and environmental health has been achieved right at the end of the year, as the National Research Council (NRC) directed EPA to examine the combined risks of exposure to phthalates, a family of toxic chemicals that have been linked to allergies and asthma, infertility, reduced testosterone concentrations, and, most worrisome, abnormal development of reproductive system in baby boys.

Phthalates are used in a wide variety of consumer products such as fragrances, cosmetics and shampoos, medical devices, soft toys that children and pets play with and often chew, building and home decorating materials, and even children's clothing. Because of health concerns associated with phthalates, several of them have been restricted in the European Union and the US; yet, a parent looking for a phthalate-free baby powder or a soft toy may not know what to buy, since manufacturers frequently don't disclose all ingredients in consumer products. Meanwhile, many different phthalates contaminate the bodies of most Americans, including children developing in the womb, since phthalate exposures are nearly ubiquitous.

EWG has been bringing attention of the public, the scientific community, media, and legislators to the dangers that phthalates pose to infants, especially baby boys. EWG testified twice in front of the NRC urging the Council scientists to guide EPA on the need for a cumulative risk assessment for this family of endocrine disrupting chemicals that, unfortunately, found their way into most homes. We applaud the NRC for its strong stance on phthalates that is both scientifically based and focused on protecting public health. NRC recommendation for a cumulative risk assessment for phthalates is the first step in the right direction towards avoiding exposure to these toxic chemicals.

With this important new advance in regulatory toxicology, EPA also needs to take to heart NRC's diagnosis with what is wrong in EPA's current approach of assessing the toxicity of one chemical at a time. As the NRC reported,

Currently when conducting cumulative risk assessments, EPA often considers only chemicals that are structurally related... That practice ignores how exposures to different chemicals may result in the same health effects. The conceptual approach taken for phthalates -- to consider chemicals that cause similar health effects -- should also be applied when completing any cumulative risk assessment. For instance, EPA could evaluate the risk of combined exposures to lead, methylmercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls because all contribute to cognitive deficits consistent with IQ reduction in children.

Research by EWG and many scientists all around the world clearly demonstrated that children are exposed to numerous toxic chemicals simultaneously. That's why EWG is backing the Kid-Safe Chemicals Act, federal legislation that promises comprehensive reforms, including a requirement that manufacturers prove their chemicals are safe before they go on the market.

What can concerned parents do right now? First, we call on everybody to learn how the Kid-Safe Chemicals Act will fundamentally overhaul the outdated, ineffective system now in place that allows toxic chemicals on the market with no safety testing. Then join us to pass this important new legislation. We need your help.

Also check out the EWG For Parents site with lots of helpful tips to protect your family from industrial chemicals. And for all people on your gift list who may have children, you can find suggestions for safe, healthful, and very useful holiday gifts at EWG's Parent's Buying Guide. Happy Holidays, everybody!

Photo by gynti_46.

« Santa, please bring me toxin-free fragrance |