ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG TODAY
We need you to help protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
Get EWG widgets & blog badges.
ENVIROBLOG TO YOU
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
You could (almost) eat this furniture
Is your sunscreen in EWG's Sunscreen Hall of Shame?
Fracking: Live chat with EWG & 'Gasland' director Josh Fox
Understanding Sunscreen: 4 Questions about SPF
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Infant formula: How to choose it & use it
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Autism: There's more of it, not just better detection | Main | Klean Kanteen: Once, twice, still worth it »
EWG asks HHS nominee Tom Daschle: what about toxics?
Topic A at the Senate confirmation hearing for Health and Human secretary nominee Tom Daschle was health reform. Also Topics B through Y. That's understandable: this country's health crisis is monumental. Fixing it has to be a top priority of the Obama administration. 
But we also want to know how Secretary-designate Daschle will confront the challenges of preventing illness and safeguarding public health by reducing exposures to chemical contaminants in food, water and the environment.
We were glad to hear the former South Dakota senator say that as a general proposition, "I want to reinstate a science-driven environment. I want to take ideology and politics, as much as humanly possible, out of the process and leave the scientists to do their job."
That's good news, because over the past two years, two separate congressional investigations have uncovered conflicts of interest among contractors hired by the National Institutes of Health, particularly the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Toxicology Program to assess the risk of chemicals in the environment. In some instances, contractors were also working for industries with direct financial interest in regulatory decisions.
As well, FDA advisory committees and other outside advisory panels have become heavily influenced by scientists with financial and business ties to the industries being regulated. We hope to hear exactly how Secretary-designate Daschle will address this issue.
We hope Daschle will press the federal Food and Drug Administration to consider all the science available as it decides how to protect people, especially children, from bisphenol A, a plastics component and toxic sex hormone, and other chemical contaminants in food, personal care products and medical devices. The Bush administration practice of giving weight only to industry-sponsored studies must stop, now.
As well, it makes sense for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to expand its biomonitoring program, which measures human body burdens of industrial chemicals. The program tests people six years of age and older -- and so far, its findings have been chilling. It hasn't measured chemicals present in the blood and urine of the fetus and infants -- the most vulnerable members of society, who are most likely to be damaged by exposure to dangerous substances. EWG's studies of cord blood show that some chemicals are reaching infants in the womb and that babies are being born pre-polluted. We need much more extensive research on exposure to chemicals and their impact at crucial stages of development.
We hope to hear soon what steps Daschle will take to investigate the extent to which babies and small children have industrial chemicals in their bodies and to regulate these chemicals to ensure our kids are safe.
My daughter is pregnant with her first baby. How can I remain sane knowing all this toxic misery? I am so very grateful to you for the work you do. Sheila
Green your home and remove harmful & dangerous toxins! It’s difficult to keep up with all of the recalls in regards to toys that contain unsafe amounts of lead; Inspect-A-Toy is a new company whose interest is that of screening toys, jewelry and other consumer products in your home for the presence of this dangerous toxin. Inspect-A-Toy technicians come directly to your home, school, daycare facility, and retail store with their state-of-the-art, laboratory-grade, handheld X-Ray Fluorescence device. They are the only company in California that provides this extraordinary service and are a true pioneer in the Green Industry! Please call 714-273-9047 or email jamievolbrecht@yahoo.com to set up an appointment.
Not only do you need to screen your home from harmful contaminants you also need to screen your water which is laden with harmful chemicals. Lead, fluoride, arsenic, thm's, pesticides just to name a few that can cause irrevisable damage to babies and children. I just read an article on how much fluoride is in dog food and how many dogs are being diagnosed with bone cancer. Fluoride is a poison, yet we let the goverment put it in our water supplies that we give to our children under the pretense of cavity control. There is already fluoride in our toothpaste and people, read the warning on your tube, do not swallow, why is that, because fluoride is a toxin.