ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.


Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page
YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Join EWG's live chat with Chef Ann Cooper

School lunch: More fruits & veggies, please!

Texas Schools are Drilling for Dollars

Why do blowouts take so long to fix?

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

Top Blog Award

Top  blogs award

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« GAO presses for EPA fix | Main | New study and new dangers of the old toxic Teflon chemical »

Study links tap water to high lead levels in Washington children

January 28, 2009

leadwater.jpg

Special to Enviroblog by Alex Formuzis, EWG Director of Communications

Researchers have found a shockingly high lead levels in the blood of young Washington, D.C. children tested between 2001 and 2004, when the District of Columbia's drinking water was being contaminated with lead from aging pipes.

In a study published yesterday (Jan. 27) on the website of Environmental Science and Technology, scientists Marc Edwards and Simoni Triantafyllidou of Virginia Tech and Dana Best the Children's National Medical Center in Washington wrote that the number of babies and toddlers with elevated lead levels in their blood increased by more than four times, compared to the pre-2001 period.

The study, first reported yesterday by Carol D. Leonnig of the Washington Post, said that hundreds of children in the nation's capital experienced elevated blood-lead levels in the 2001-2004 period, and many of the youngest could suffer irreversible IQ loss or other developmental difficulties.

D.C.'s lead contamination crisis was triggered by a 2000 decision by D.C. Water and Sewer Authority officials to change disinfectants, from free chlorine to chloramine. Lead levels in D.C. water began rising in 2001 but were not publicized until the Post disclosed them in February 2004.


"The switch in disinfectant reduced the concentration of potential carcinogens (a byproduct of chlorine disinfection) to levels below those specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency," the researchers wrote. "However, the chloramines also altered the water chemistry and unexpectedly caused lead to leach from lead service line pipes and other plumbing materials such as leaded brass and solder. The resulting contamination affected water lead levels throughout the city."

At the time of the crisis, officials acknowledged that some neighborhoods showed particularly high water lead levels. But the new study is the first to draw a strong correlation between the hardest-hit neighborhoods and elevated lead blood levels in young children: in the neighborhoods with the highest risk of exposure, the study said, the incidence of elevated blood levels among children of 1.3 years or younger increased by 2.4 times, compared to pre-crisis levels.

Leonnig reported yesterday that the new study raise concerns about 42,000 D.C. children, now ages 4 to 9, who were in the womb or younger than 2 during the water crisis and who were exposed to significant amounts to lead
The lead contamination crisis

Lead, a powerful neurotoxin, was banned from household paint in 1978 and finally removed from gasoline in 1996. As a result of these two major public health decisions lead levels in the blood of children have declined by almost 90 percent.

Unfortunately, lead is only one of the contaminants Washington residents and other Americans need to worry about when they fill a sippycup for a toddler oor make a jug of lemonade on a hot summer day.

A 2005 EWG analysis of water utility tests from 42 states found that tap water was polluted with 260 chemical contaminants. Lead was found in tap water in 35 states.

A growing number of studies have also found trace levels of scores of pharmaceuticals and household product chemical residues that have no been effectively removed by municipalwater treatment plants.

Aging water infrastructure adds to the pollution burden in tap water. EWG and its allies in the environmental health field are calling on President Obama and Congressional leaders to direct adequate resources from the stimulus package to update the nation's water-system infrastructure.

« GAO presses for EPA fix |