ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

DONATE TO EWG TODAY

We need you to help protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

ENVIROBLOG TO YOU

 Enviroblog in your Reader

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

You could (almost) eat this furniture

Is your sunscreen in EWG's Sunscreen Hall of Shame?

Fracking: Live chat with EWG & 'Gasland' director Josh Fox

Understanding Sunscreen: 4 Questions about SPF

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

select month July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004

FEATURED

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Infant formula: How to choose it & use it

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« When "pure" is not pure or how did our lack of regulations allow cancer-causing chemicals in baby's products | Main | Chat with the experts about toxics in kids' bath products »

Toxins in your hood? You have the right to know, again....

Special to Enviroblog by Alex Formuzis, EWG Director of Communications

Amid all of the negative and downright depressing news about the global economic meltdown, Wall Street swindlers, pirates, middle east violence and the break-up of Bristol Palin and Keith Johnson - I didn't see that comin' - there was some very good news many in the environmental and public health communities have been waiting for.

"Companies will have to provide more detailed disclosure of toxic chemicals they release into the environment under a little-noticed provision in the massive spending bill President Obama signed into law yesterday," Juliet Eilperin reported in the March 12, 2009 edition of the Washington Post.

That provision was authored by New Jersey's senior Senator Frank R. Lautenberg (D-NJ) to reverse a Bush-era regulation that had stripped away important reporting requirements for the chemical industry.

Before Bush and his industry-run Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) changed the rules, chemical facilities had to disclose to the EPA, and thus to the public, any chemical releases of 500 pounds a year or more. The mountain biker-in-chief thought that was just too much to ask of industry and did away with disclosure requirements for releases of less than 2,000 pounds a year.

If President Brush-Clearer thought at all about families living near chemical plants and the toxins being discharged into their communities, he sure didn't show it.

"The public has a right to know about chemicals in their air and water," Lautenberg said after his provision passed. "The Bush Administration watered down this law and let facilities hide critical data about their toxic chemical emissions. It is time to restore the public's right to know about the release of toxic chemicals in their communities."

Lautenberg is the author of the Toxic Release Inventory program, the public, EPA-hosted database that houses all information related to virtually all toxic chemical releases across the U.S.

Lautenberg's creation became part of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, passed in response to the 1984 disaster in Bhopal, India, in which a Union Carbide pesticide plant released 40 tons of a deadly gas (methyl isocyanate or MIC). The unofficial death toll climbed to as many as 28,000, according to the BBC, and some 50,000 people were left with lifelong disabilities. Union Carbide agreed to pay $470 million in compensation.

But Bhopal is the rare and extreme case. Most episodes of chemical pollution are silent, gradual and insidious, and their impact on human health is subtle and elusive. That's why we need to track even small toxic releases as they are occurring.

Or, better yet, prevent them from happening at all.

« When "pure" is not pure or how did our lack of regulations allow cancer-causing chemicals in baby's products |