ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

DONATE TO EWG TODAY

We need you to help protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

ENVIROBLOG TO YOU

 Enviroblog in your Reader

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

Kid-Safe Chemicals Act YouTube
Environmental Working Group's Facebook Page

Twitter

    You could (almost) eat this furniture

    Is your sunscreen in EWG's Sunscreen Hall of Shame?

    Fracking: Live chat with EWG & 'Gasland' director Josh Fox

    Understanding Sunscreen: 4 Questions about SPF

    SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

    FIND PAST POSTS

    FEATURED

    Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

    Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

    So what products CAN we use?

    Infant formula: How to choose it & use it

    EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

    EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

    Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform

    EWG on TV

    Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

    Toxic Tub?

    Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

    Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

    BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

    Ask EWG

    What can I do about fluoride in my water?

    What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

    What is "fragrance"?

    Which infant formula is best?

    Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

    Is mineral-based makeup safer?

    Ask EWG Archives

    Top Blog Award

    Top  blogs award

    PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

    Breast Cancer Fund

    The Daily Green

    Eco Child's Play

    Environmental Defense Fund

    Green Moms Carnival

    Grist

    Healthy Child, Healthy World

    Huffington Post Green

    NRDC's Switchboard

    Organic.org

    Safer States

    TreeHugger

    TALK TO US

    Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

    « The Enviroblog Top 10 in 2008: What was on our minds? | Main | Toxins in your hood? You have the right to know, again.... »

    When "pure" is not pure or how did our lack of regulations allow cancer-causing chemicals in baby's products

    March 12, 2009

    babybath.jpg

    Being a parent should not be a scary thing. It is supposed to be the time of joy, fun and reward. Ok, and a few boo-boos.

    But trying to keep your child clean and healthy is serious business. Especially when you read the new report, released today, by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics. EWG is the founding member of the campaign, along with groups such as Alliance for a Healthy Tomorrow, Breast Cancer Fund, Clean Water Fund, Commonweal, Friends of the Earth, Massachusetts Breast Cancer Coalition, National Black Environmental Justice Network, National Environmental Trust and Women's Voices for the Earth.

    The study documents the widespread presence of formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane, potent cancer-causing chemicals, in bath products for children. Neither one of those chemicals are listed on labels, since both are by-products formed when preservatives react to one another.

    The Campaign tested 28 products and found that


    • Over 60 percent items contained both formaldehyde and 1,4-dioxane. These included Johnson's Baby Shampoo, Sesame Street Bubble Bath, Grins & Giggles Milk & Honey Baby Wash and Huggies Naturally Refreshing Cucumber & Green Tea Baby Wash.

    • Over 80 percent of products contained formaldehyde at levels ranging from 54 to 610 parts per million (ppm).

    • Almost 70 percent of products contained 1,4-dioxane at levels ranging from 0.27 to 35 ppm.

    All of these products were marketed as "gentle" and "pure." Obviously they're not.

    As regular readers of this blog know, the cosmetics industry is self-regulating and can do whatever it wants. Cosmetics companies can add nearly any ingredient to cosmetics without government-regulated safety testing. The system is so broken that parents cannot be assured that shampoos, bubble baths and lotions they put on their kids are safe. The standards in the U.S. are far behind the standards in Europe or Japan.

    So what can parents do? It's impossible to shop your way out of this problem. But, you can use fewer products, use products with fewer ingredients and search our Skin Deep database for alternatives. And lobby congress to pass health protective laws. Or just move to Europe or Japan.

    « The Enviroblog Top 10 in 2008: What was on our minds? |