ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
New York State: Avoid these 85 chemicals if you can
Wal-Mart Launches Healthy Food Initiative
On skiing: Sunny slopes & toxic wax
Under new law, USDA changes school lunch
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Eden Foods: A BPA-Free Pioneer | Main | Prop 65 misses the mark on BPA: Let's hope Sacramento does better »
Buying our way to utopia? Not so much.
By Lisa Frack
Hi, my name is Lisa and I spend more time reading labels than ballots. There, I said it. Why do I spend so much time reading labels? A bit of introspection tells me that there are 3 main reasons:
- To prevent toxic chemicals from affecting my children's health,
- To support companies that value the environment and the people affected because I want my money to do good, not harm, and frankly,
- To keep my money out of the hands of companies who are trashing the environment and communities where they work - and profiting all the while. I really don't want them to think I like what they're doing.
Can we change the world, one purchase at a time?
I don't hunt down 'greener' products specifically to force the market to serve me better or to change public policy, but I do believe a little in what Diane MacEachern coined my Big Green Purse.
I am American, after all, and aren't we trained to shop our way to change? Trained to be satisfied by an indirect, needle-in-a-haystack message to manufacturers from the cash register? It's so dang handy to buy what I need and send a political message simultaneously. So great to multi-task! Getting political and buying milk all at once! If only it were working.
I mean, I've been buying organic produce and less-toxic stuff for years, yet - surprise! - the problems persist. Sure, I'm not expecting to buy my way to strong environmental and health-protective policies single-handedly, but even if a whole lot of us join forces (we have already, haven't we?), I am very skeptical that buying organic peaches and BPA-free water bottles for the next 10 years is going to alter, say, the backwards U.S. farm subsidy system or ensure that the chemicals allowed in children's products won't give them cancer or prevent them from having children. You?
Lessons from Food, Inc. on Huffington Post
When I read Susanne Friedberg's piece on Food, Inc. on Huffington Post last week - Vote Now, Eat Later - I was struck all over again by the argument that the current obsession (mine included) with buying our way to safe food and toxic-free products is getting in the way (yes, getting in the way) of the real political work it will take to effect the significant and long-overdue regulatory change we need to ensure safe products and food and create manufacturing and agricultural practices that value people and land and animals.
How is it getting in the way? Simple: It's easier to read labels than to try to make systemic policy change, it's more convenient to incorporate change-making into activities in which we're already engaged, it's time-consuming to research and locate safer products, so we have less time for political meetings, and it gives us a false sense that we are making change, when really we're not.
Ms. Friedberg tells us, and I couldn't agree more, that it's going to take far more than shopping (sorry) to get out of this one, so roll up your sleeves and let's get political. She actually covers 4 reasons why market-driven change is NOT the answer:
- It's an impractical and unfair burden on consumers.
- It only delivers changes that the market finds profitable.
- Being a safer alternative doesn't guarantee anything else (like living wages and the rest of it).
- It is fundamentally undemocratic to suggest that money spent on safer products is a potential vote for change.
She wraps up short, sweet and to the point:
Informed consumer buying power is not trivial. It is also no substitute for political actions to empower everybody to worry less about ...food and enjoy it more.
Don't stop reading labels: That's our goal but we're definitely not there yet
Oh, I'm not recommending that you quit reading labels. Not a chance. Just suggesting that when the ballot comes, when a pro-environment candidate runs, when a representative is ready to cast a vote in your state legislature or in Congress, when your county gets ready to spray pesticides on the roadsides, it's time to make some time for the democratic process of making - and reforming - public policy.
And you can start right here, with the Kid-Safe Chemicals Act. What can you do? So glad you asked:
- Sign the petition to protect kids
- Add your organization
- Speak up! Contact your legislators
- Host a Kid-Safe House Party
- Tell your friends
- Get a badge for your blog
These are the actions that will take us where we want to go, to a place where we don't have to read labels because (imagine, for just a moment) our products and food are safe.
[Thanks to robholland & Flickr CC for the shoppin' pic]
Leave a comment