ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG TODAY
We need you to help protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
Get EWG widgets & blog badges.
ENVIROBLOG TO YOU
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
You could (almost) eat this furniture
Is your sunscreen in EWG's Sunscreen Hall of Shame?
Fracking: Live chat with EWG & 'Gasland' director Josh Fox
Understanding Sunscreen: 4 Questions about SPF
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Infant formula: How to choose it & use it
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
Let's talk some serious shop about TSCA reform
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Intersex fish on Colbert Nation | Main | Because pesticides on your food aren't bad enough »
New Doubts About Roundup
By Elaine Shannon
As the East Coast monsoon season slogs on, there's carnage in the garden. The dandelions and plantains are elbowing the grass aside, and the morning glory vines are garrotting the daylilies. Over at Strosnider's Hardware, that bottle of Roundup is looking pretty fetching.
Mine is not an original thought. Glyphosate, the active chemical in Roundup and many other broadleaf weedkillers, is one of the most popular and widely used herbicides in the U.S. Americans use about 100 million pounds of glyphosate annually, to kill weeds in fields of "Roundup-ready" soybeans and corn, on lawns, along highway rights-of-way, around oil tanks and on lawns. For decades, the U.S. State Department has financed the use of Glyphosate to kill hardy coca plants in the Andes.
The U.S. government has treated the Roundup and other Glyphosate-based herbicides as relatively safe. "Glyphosate is strongly adsorbed to soil, with little potential for leaching to ground water," the Environmental Protection Agency says on its website. "Microbes in the soil readily and completely degrade it even under low temperature conditions. It tends to adhere to sediments when released to water. Glyphosate does not tend to accumulate in aquatic life."
But a recent report in Environmental Health News raises new questions about Roundup's safety. EHN highlights a new study by University of Caen scientists Nora Benachour and Gilles-Eric Séralini that shows that Roundup kills human cells, even when diluted "far below agricultural recommendations and [at an amount that] corresponds to low levels of residues in food or feed."
There's a twist: the culprit in the Caen study is not Glyphosate but so-called inert ingredients. "Astonishingly," the study says, "the supposed inert product POEA (polyethoxylated tallowamine) is the most potent one."
Benachour and Séralini, who is also an outspoken critic of genetically modified food crops, conclude that mixing Glyphosate with POEA, a detergent that helps Glyphosate penetrate a plant's skin, creates a more poisonous product than its component parts.
"This work clearly confirms that the adjuvants [ingredients that enhance a weed-killer's effects] in Roundup formulations are not inert," the scientists write. Gylphosate-based herbicides now on the market , they say, "could cause cell damage and even death around residual levels to be expected, especially in food and feed derived from R[oundup] formulation-treated crops. "
This assertion is sure to stir debate and calls for much more research. I'm for both.
Meantime, I'm learning to see chickweed, clover, purslane and such as a nice mottled patchwork. And in the case of dandelions, lunch.
Purslane can be lunch too! It is highly nutritious and tastes good. Or at least I think so! Since I don't have a yard, I actually BUY purslane at the farmer's market!
Chickweed is so nutritious and fabulous in a green smoothie. If people would just change their thinking on what is beautiful and use a little hard work in the yard. They would have a nice yard without chemicals and they would not have to go to the gym. Treat yard work like excercise. We somehow have to change peoples thinking. There is too much toxins in our environment and I cannot understand why people are not worried about it. Where is the diconnect?
actually, you should consider chickweed, clover and purslane for lunch as well!