ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
ASK EWG: Handwashing safely, without a sink
Progress: Less lead allowed in water pipes
EWG's Top 10 Good Environmental News Stories of 2010
EWG's Worst Environmental Stories of 2010
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« State of the Rockies Project Studies Big Ag | Main | Cell Phone Radiation Series - Part 2: 8 Ways to Reduce Your Exposure »
New Yorkers Focus On Gas Drilling Threat
By Elaine Shannon
Natural gas may seem clean, but it has a dark back story.
As Environmental Working Group has reported, gas producers out West have drilled thousands of wells with hydraulic fracturing or "fracking," which involves breaking open gas-bearing formations by injecting them with water laced with toxic chemicals like benzene. 
To make matters worse, gas drillers have been exempted from the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and permitted to conceal, as trade secrets, the identities of the chemicals they're forcing underground.
Now gas producers are moving in to exploit the gas-rich Marcellus Shale, which stretches from New York state to West Virginia, and New York leaders are paying heed to warnings from EWG and others that fracking threatens New York's water supply.
Last week, the New York Times editorial page called for barring gas drilling in the New York City watershed. The Times asserted:
The dangers are particularly acute in the Marcellus Shale, which, unlike the relatively shallow formations found elsewhere, lies miles underground.Getting the gas out will require far more water and heavy doses of chemicals.While the rules would require drillers to take special precautions in the watershed, there are too many points -- from the delivery of the fluid to the drilling site to the removal of spent fluid after it surfaces -- where poisoned water could escape into the water supplies.
On Friday, EWG senior analyst Dusty Horwitt is scheduled to testify about the dangers of fracking at a hearing of the New York City Council Committee on Environmental Protection, which has been probing gas drilling activities in the watershed.
Meanwhile, National Public Radio ombudsman Alicia Shepard has faulted the organization's September series on natural gas for failing to devote more than two of its 24 minutes to gas production's environmental destruction.
"The ultimate question is: Did this series give a reasonably complete and balanced view of issues concerning domestic drilling for natural gas?" Shepard wrote. "The answer is no."
According to Shepard, Brian Duffy, then the NPR projects editor, blamed NPR's financial woes -- symptomatic of the global news industry meltdown -- for the series' shortcomings. She wrote:
"Should we have covered the issue more thoroughly? Certainly," said Duffy, who left NPR's news department in late August. "This was a situation where we couldn't get all the bases covered because we had furloughs [caused by NPR's budget cuts] and vacation issues and changes in personnel.The story absolutely did need an environmental component. I won't disagree with that. It's a shame we just couldn't provide it."
Leave a comment