ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Tell Congress: Pass the Healthy, Hunger-free Kids Act

European Union Stands Up for Infants

Polluting babies? It just takes a phone call

On Turkeys: Arsenic In, Arsenic Out

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

select month December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004

FEATURED

Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure

So what products CAN we use?

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Green Moms Carnival

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.

« Honoring Environmentalist and Philanthropist Richard Goldman | Main | A cookbook for everyone on EWG's list »

California Regulators Pull a Bait-and-Switch on Green Chemistry

By Renee Sharp, EWG California Director

In September 2008, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger celebrated the signing of two bills (AB 1879 and SB 509) that, he said, would propel "California to the forefront of the nation and the world with the most comprehensive Green Chemistry program ever established."

Once they went into effect, he said, "we will stop looking at toxics as an inevitable byproduct of industrial production. Instead they will be something that can be removed from every product in the design stage, protecting people's health and our environment."

It sounded pretty good -- in theory.

CA Green Chemistry Law is a Major Disappointment
Two years later, after countless public workshops, straw proposals and drafts of regulations, the reality is turning out to be a major disappointment. More than that, it's a betrayal.

On Sept. 14, the California Department of Toxics Substances Control (DTSC) issued what it called close-to-final regulations for a 45-day public comment period. Those draft regulations weren't everything we hoped for, but they at least presented a small step toward protecting the public from the threats posed by toxic chemicals in consumer products and meeting the intent of the legislation.

More Bad News: 11th-hour Bait-and-Switch Maneuver
Then, at the eleventh hour, the Schwarzenegger administration and the toxics control department pulled a classic bait-and-switch maneuver.

Just two weeks after the deadline for comments had passed, the agency issued a revised set of regulations that essentially gutted the Green Chemistry program established by the two laws. The changes were made without notifying or seeking input from the public or even the Green Ribbon Science Panel, which the law established to advise DTSC in developing the regulations. What's more, they gave the public only 15 days to comment on latest draft.

Californians will be worse off than before
If the new last-minute regulations go into effect without being fundamentally overhauled, Californians will actually be worse off than before: Some State legislators could point to the inept program as an excuse not to get involved in the issue of toxic chemicals, and state regulators would have their hands tied in knots by a program that is structured to spin wheels and eventually fail.

The proposed regulations would also set a terrible precedent for the nation, because many aspects of the gutted California program are actually worse than the flawed and outdated federal 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act.

EWG asks Governor-elect Brown to stop the madness
That's why Environmental Working Group is calling out this bait-and-switch ploy for what it is. We're telling Gov. Schwarzenegger and the Department of Toxic Substances Control that they won't get away with this dirty trick and calling on governor-elect Jerry Brown to stop the regulations from going forward next year -- unless they are radically revised to live up to the goals of California's pioneering Green Chemistry laws.

« Honoring Environmentalist and Philanthropist Richard Goldman |