ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
Wal-Mart Launches Healthy Food Initiative
On skiing: Sunny slopes & toxic wax
Under new law, USDA changes school lunch
11th-Hour Scramble Foils California Chemical Lobby
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Wal-Mart Launches Healthy Food Initiative | Main | You just lost an excuse to buy bottled water »
New York State: Avoid these 85 chemicals if you can
By Olga Naidenko, PhD, EWG Senior Scientist
When someone with $8 billion a year in purchasing power tells the world what they don't want, marketers and manufacturers are likely to pay attention.
That's what's happened recently in New York, where state agencies operate 16,000 facilities and a fleet of 17,000 vehicles and generate more than 800,000 tons of waste a year. The state has a new official policy that urges those agencies, for the sake of public health, to avoid buying things that contain any of 85 toxic chemicals whenever they can find safer, cost-effective alternatives. The goal is to minimize New Yorkers' exposure to these chemicals as much as possible and keep the bad stuff from ending up in landfills.
The unprecedented step is a victory for the people of the New York, but potentially also for other states that may be inspired to follow the Empire State's example.
A special inter-agency committee adopted the policy two days before the end of 2010 and published its "avoidance list." On it are known and probable human carcinogens as well as substances that accumulate in the body and don't readily break down in the environment, the so-called persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic chemicals - PBTs for short.
Said Anne Rabe of the national Center for Health, Environment & Justice:
"This will have a major impact on greening the marketplace with New York State's annual buying power of $9 billion."
Although it is advisory only and agencies are not required to follow it, The Green Procurement Chemical Avoidance List is a powerful model for exercising consumer choice on a grand scale to protect public health from toxic chemicals in products, building materials or equipment.
The list is the product of a four-year effort that brought together multiple environmental groups, aided by supportive New York state officials. Former Gov. David A. Paterson signed the executive order creating the inter-agency committee in April 2008, and newly installed Gov. Andrew Cuomo renewed it shortly after taking office this month.
We at Environmental Working Group applaud these inspiring efforts. The protection of public health - and the hard work of purchasing officers seeking to make best decisions for their communities - will be greatly aided by the decision in New York.
Leave a comment