ABOUT
Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.
DONATE TO EWG!
Help us protect your health and environment! Please donate $5 to EWG today.
GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS
Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.
ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL
EWG testifies on behalf of clean drinking water (...and bagels)
If you ask a caveman a chemistry question...
Fluoride in your water: How much is too much?
Borax: Not the green alternative it's cracked up to be
SEARCH ENVIROBLOG
FEATURED
Support the 2010 Safe Cosmetics Act. It's Urgent.
Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?
Cell phone radiation series - Part 2: 8 Ways to reduce your exposure
Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked
EWG's Tips for Parents: The Series
EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure
EWG on TV
Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill
Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water
Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen
BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics
What can I do about fluoride in my water?
What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?
Are stainless steel water bottles safe?
Is mineral-based makeup safer?
PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS
TALK TO US
Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.
« Hold the Applause | Main | Chromium-6 in Gas Drilling Wastes? »
Labor camps? Fine. But BPA crosses the line.
By Alex Formuzis, EWG Vice President for Media Relations
China:
- Where anyone who speaks out against the government will likely languish for years in a prison cell;
- Where crackdowns on the press and Internet access happen again and again;
- Where consumer products contaminated with very dangerous pollutants, such as antifreeze in toothpaste, are frequently sold and exported;
- And now, where the intensely pro-business government is moving to do what U.S. officials have long refused to do - ban the plastics chemical bisphenol-A (BPA) from baby bottles and other products that hold food and drinks for children.
Home Sweet Home, by contrast:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has never taken steps to get BPA out of children's products, and just last fall the U.S. Senate dropped legislation to restrict BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups at the request of the chemical industry.
When China gets out front of the U.S. on protecting children's health, it's clear that our leaders' priorities are out of whack.
All the same, Beijing's announcement is very good news for American consumers. China probably makes some of the BPA-containing products that end up on U.S. store shelves, including items we give to our children.
In Congress, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) have both re-introduced legislation to get BPA out of baby bottles and sippy cups, but its prospects for passage in the new Congress are slim, at best. The Republican-controlled House just passed a bill that would cut EPA's budget by a third, all but ending the Obama administration's efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions, and slash funding for 57 poison control centers by 93 percent. The new leadership of the "people's house" has tossed protections for children's health over the side so industry can get what it wants.
I was going to pass along some tips on how to avoid BPA, but my colleague at the Natural Resources Defense Council has already done that.
[Thanks to Flickr CC & theogeo for the pretty map of China]
Leave a comment