ABOUT

Smart discussion of the latest science and news on toxins in your food, water, and air, and what government agencies should be doing to protect public health. Written by EWG staff.

Follow ewgtoxics on Twitter

DONATE TO EWG!

Help us protect your health and environment!  Please donate $5 to EWG today.

GET EWG'S TIPS & ACTION ALERTS

Sign Up here to receive email updates and tips from EWG and stay informed on the issues that matter most to you.

YouTube

ENVIROBLOG VIA EMAIL

Delivered by FeedBurner

 Enviroblog in your Reader

Get EWG widgets & blog badges.

Kids' Food a Fly Won't Touch

The new crop of eco-films: Which should you see?

Top 10 Environment Stories of the Decade -- That You Might Have Missed

Healthy Home Tips for your holiday kitchen

SEARCH ENVIROBLOG

FIND PAST POSTS

FEATURED

Toxins in our Kids' Foods: Where is the FDA?

Why, oh why is there plastic in my aluminum water bottle?

Fluoride in Your Water: How much is too much?

Borax: Not the Green Alternative It's Cracked Up to Be

Test Your Knowledge of Cosmetics Safety: 8 Myths Debunked

EWG's Healthy Home Tips

EWG's Tips to avoid BPA exposure

EWG on TV

Cutting the Pork from U.S. Farm Bill

Toxic Tub?

Sunscreen safety & DC drinking water

Perchlorate in people, kids' personal care products & plastics, and sunscreen

BPA in baby formula & safe cosmetics

Ask EWG

What can I do about fluoride in my water?

What is new carpet treated with? What can I do?

What is "fragrance"?

Which infant formula is best?

Are stainless steel water bottles safe?

Is mineral-based makeup safer?

Ask EWG Archives

PEOPLE TALKING TOXICS

Breast Cancer Fund

The Daily Green

Eco Child's Play

Environmental Defense Fund

Grist

Healthy Child, Healthy World

Huffington Post Green

NRDC's Switchboard

Organic.org

Safer States

TreeHugger

TALK TO US

Did we miss something? Email Enviroblog.


Other posts about Food Safety

By Lisa Frack

October 17, 2011

frootloops.jpgBy Alex Formuzis, EWG V-P for Media Relations

The fortunate among us need never struggle with either hunger or obesity. This morning my healthy 3-year old had yogurt, a banana and scrambled egg whites for breakfast before beginning her day. But for many in the U.S. and around the world, the story is very different.

Last month (Sept. 22), the World Disasters Report 2011 of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) highlighted the two very different struggles that people around the world are facing over food: the number of people considered overweight or obese has hit 1.5 billion, far outnumbering the 925 million who are literally fighting for crumbs.

The obesity epidemic is most often identified with Americans and other Western populations, but it has exploded into a full blown crisis in much of the rest of the world as well, including countries such as China and India that also have millions of people going hungry. And "globesity," as it's called, is on course to afflict millions more. The World Health Organization predicts that more than 2.3 billion people will be overweight and 700 million considered obese by 2015.

As in the United States, the global obesity epidemic hits hard among children. Worldwide, the World Health Organization found that more than 43 million children under 5 years of age were overweight, 35 million of them in developing countries.

Why is this happening? One of the main reasons is that more people than ever are consuming heavily processed "food" that offers little more than calories, sugar and fats.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calculates that about 17 percent of American children between 2 and 19 years of age are now obese, a threefold increase since 1980. And in the US, like the rest of the world, childhood obesity is much more prevalent in low-income communities where fast food chains and snack stores are often the cheapest, most convenient options for families.

Those with fewer resources are more likely to have diets heavy in processed food instead of fresh fruits, vegetables, proteins and whole grains. The CDC estimates that one of every seven preschoolers from low-income families is technically obese.

Spreading the Inactivity and Poor Diet

In addition to fundamental shifts in diets driven by the availability of fast food, other factors contributing to the explosion of obesity around the world include decreased physical activity due to improved access to modern transportation, including cars, trains and buses.

As the World Health Organization put it, "Increased consumption of more energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods with high levels of sugar and saturated fats, combined with reduced physical activity, have led to obesity rates that have risen three-fold or more since 1980..."

"They are simply catching up with us in terms of all the modern 'conveniences,' such as fast food, vending machines and so on," said Dr. David Katz, director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center.

On the other end of this dismal spectrum is the growing number of people who suffer from undernourishment. According to the IFRC, 15 percent of the world's population goes to bed hungry each night - many of them children.

Not surprisingly, the vast majority of them are in the populous countries of Asia. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations has this geographical breakdown for 2010:

Food Divide for EB.png

Extreme poverty, political and military conflict, climate change and misguided agriculture policies in the developed world all play a role in this catastrophe.

In recent years, for instance, the United States Congress has mandated that fully 40 percent of all corn crops be used for ethanol, taking out of production millions of acres of farmland that could have been dedicated to food instead of fuel. This policy has put pressure on prices of this and other food staples, reducing the availability of common grains for famine-plagued populations.

Hunger Amid Plenty
Adding to the crisis is the fact that vast amounts of food are simply wasted. Americans alone throw out about 40 percent of the food they buy, according to Jonathan Bloom, author of American Wasteland.

Today, Oct. 19, 2011, nearly 18,000 people worldwide will die from hunger-related causes. In the same 24 hours, only a little more than $3 million will be spent globally on food aid - a tenth of what Americans and Europeans combined will spend on pet food.

Yet there are 515 million obese people around world right now, and, today, Oct. 19, 2011, obesity-related diseases will cost the U.S. economy more than $281 million. These figures come from data and research conducted by the WHO, the United Nations and the National Institutes of Health.

If nothing changes, the arc of these pandemics will leave more than 3 billion people sick, dying or dead in the next few years. By 2020, those affected would make up about a third of the entire world population.

"If the free interplay of market forces has produced an outcome where 15 per cent of humanity is hungry while a fifth is overweight, something has gone wrong. Economics exists for people, not vice versa," wrote Bekele Geleta, the secretary general of the Red Cross/Red Crescent federation. "If this lamentable situation is to be tackled, we must find ways to regulate the laws of supply and demand and promote a more equitable distribution of food between those who have too little to eat, and those with too much."


You'll find Mr. Geleta's entire statement here. It's compelling commentary and analysis of this global crisis.

By Leeann Brown

June 9, 2011

By: Margot Pagan and Senior Scientist Rebecca Sutton, PhD

Did you think you were eating a carcinogen along with your favorite chicken sandwich last week? Probably not, but a new Food and Drug Administration study has found arsenic in chickens treated with 3-Nitro® (also known as Roxarsone), a commonly used, arsenic-based animal drug.
Arsenic in chicken blog post pic.jpg
Don't let that completely ruin your appetite -- as a result of FDA's tests, Alpharma, a subsidiary of Pfizer Inc., is voluntarily suspending U.S. sales of Roxarsone for chickens within 30 days.

Last Thanksgiving we discussed how industrial and agricultural uses of arsenic products leads to contaminated poultry.

Keep in mind - arsenic is a widespread contaminant in water, air, soil and other foods. Yes, that's a bit daunting, but it shouldn't deter us from seeking to eliminate unnecessary pollution sources, such as arsenic-laced chicken feed.

Roxarsone has been a major contributor to arsenic pollution. It has been used to kill intestinal parasites, artificially promote growth and stain chicken flesh pink since 1944 when FDA approved its use. Recent research prompted the agency to update its position after finding inorganic arsenic, a known human carcinogen, in edible parts of the birds. The findings prompted Pfizer to pull Roxarsone off the market in the U.S. (the European Union banned arsenic in poultry feed in 1999).

Unfortunately, Roxarsone is just one of the animal drugs and antibiotics routinely used in factory-produced chicken. Alpharma also produces another arsenic-based drug, Nitarsone, which remains on the market.

We stand by our previous advice to minimize your exposure to antibiotics in chicken by seeking out certified organically-fed, humanely raised, antibiotic- and hormone-free poultry.

Still curious? FDA has an FAQ page to learn more.

Chicken image: Copyright © Fir0002/Flagstaffotos, GNU Free Documentation License.

By Lisa Frack

April 4, 2011

frootloops.jpgGuest Post by Laurie David and Robyn O'Brien, EWG Board Member

Yesterday, in the face of a just- released report by the National Cancer Institute that showed a 9.4% increase in childhood cancer between 1992 and 2007(1), the FDA let moms and dads all across America, down. Instead of making the long overdue move to do something serious about getting rid of toxic food dyes so ubiquitous in our food supply, they instead fell back on those two simple words so often used to stall, delay and deny..."more research."

In kitchens across this country, eight dyes, currently being used by manufacturers can be found in everything from packaged macaroni and cheese, breakfast cereal to practically every piece of candy your child has ever put in its mouth. Links are being found to hyperactivity in kids (ADHD), cancer and serious food allergies. (2)

But here is the truly crazy thing. Kraft, Coca Cola and Wal-Mart have already removed these artificial food colors and dyes from the same products that they distribute in other countries. They did it in response to consumer demand and an extraordinary study called the Southampton Study.

The Southampton Study (3) was unusual in that it tested children on a combination of two ingredients: tartrazine (yellow #5) and sodium benzoate. The study's designers knew that a child very rarely has occasion to ingest just a synthetic color or just a preservative; rather, a child who is gobbling up multicolored candies is probably taking in several colors and at least one preservative.

What's amazing is that in the U.K., the federal food safety agency actually funded the Southampton Study that led to even U.S. corporations eliminating synthetic colors and sodium benzoate from their U.K. products.

And in response, a whole host of companies, including the U.K. branches of Wal-Mart, Kraft, Coca Cola and the Mars candy company (who make M&Ms), have voluntarily removed artificial colors, the preservative sodium benzoate, and even aspartame from their products. Particularly those marketed to kids. Take a close look at the ingredient list for the product below.

NutriGrain Allergy Kids.jpg

Our American companies had removed these harmful ingredients from their products overseas--but not here!

Kraft, Coca Cola and Wal-mart are living proof that it is possible for giant corporations to make and sell kid-friendly, family-friendly, and healthy processed food without necessarily exposing them to a chemical cocktail that might also give them allergic reactions, brain tumors, or leukemia, or the symptoms of ADHD, as the Center for Science in the Public Interest recently highlighted in their report "Rainbow of Risks".

No need to go through all the numbers for increased health problems here. You've heard them all and it isn't pretty. For goodness sake, no more research necessary. Lets stop poisoning our own kids. Lets start assuming chemicals are dangerous until proven safe, not the other way around.

Is it too much to ask the FDA and the processed food companies for the same value to be placed on the lives of the American kids in their cost-benefit analyses that has been placed on the lives of kids in the UK?

Moms, we can create that same change here. And with 51 million moms waking up to the dangers that toxins present to the health of our kids, our numbers are equivalent to the entire population of Spain. Time to get down to business, level the playing field for our kids, and send a message to these companies. Vote with your pocketbook today, this weekend, next month as you grocery shop for your family. Because while the American children only represent 30% of our population, they are 100% of our future. So while the FDA may not value their lives accordingly, we can.

Notes:
1. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, March 31, 2011 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr141
2. Rainbow of Risks, http://www.cspinet.org/new/201006291.html
3. Southampton Study http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/additivesbehaviourfinrep.pdf

By Lisa Frack

November 22, 2010

By Lisa Frack, with Sonya Lunder and Rebecca Sutton, PhD

turkeyarsenic.jpgThere's a lot to think about when you're buying that Thanksgiving turkey: how many pounds for the number of guests, how far in advance you need to order it (and from where?), whether it's local, whether you also need a tofurkey or some such, too, for those who don't eat the real deal, and last but not least, what to stuff the thing with.

But before you sit down and say, "Pass the cranberry sauce, please," don't forget the arsenic.

The what, you say? Yes, the arsenic.

In addition to the fact that turkey meat itself contains arsenic (as do plenty of other foods), the arsenic that turkeys (and chickens) eat in their feed winds up in their waste, which then makes its way onto our farm fields as fertilizer and into our soil and water as a toxic contaminant.

It turns out that poultry feed is a major ongoing source of arsenic in the
environment. While it might sound alarming that there's arsenic in your
chicken sandwich and your Thanksgiving dinner, it's just one harmful
consequence of the conventional poultry industry's arsenic addiction.

Why are chickens and turkeys being fed arsenic?
Poultry producers often feed their birds antibiotics to combat parasites and enhance the bird's pink color (for eye appeal to consumers), and one antibiotic contains arsenic.

How do arsenic-eating chickens & turkeys pollute the environment, our food and our water?
Poultry waste is widely used as fertilizer, which of course wends its way right into nearby waterways -- and eventually distant ones, too -- contaminating them as well as the food grown on those fields.

The Chesapeake Bay is a perfect example of this, with its numerous poultry-raising factory farms. Some large poultry producers claim to have voluntarily stopped using feed with arsenic, but tests show that not to be a sure bet. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation summarizes the problem well:

"Science tells us that the arsenic in chicken feed becomes concentrated in the birds' manure. Manure is commonly spread on cropland around the Chesapeake Bay, and when the arsenic in the manure degrades it can become harmful.

Researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health have expressed concern that arsenic in chicken litter may be a risk to human health, either through exposure of poultry-house workers to airborne arsenic, or through contamination of local soils and or groundwater."

Is anyone working to remove arsenic from poultry feed?
Yes. In fact, we're pleased to see that the state of Maryland currently moving to ban arsenic from poultry feed. The European Union banned it in 1999, and last year about this time Rep. Steve Israel of New York introduced the Poison-Free Poultry Act of 2009. It didn't pass -- though we wish it had.

Some poultry producers say they have voluntarily stopped using the arsenic, but subsequent tests and oddly high sales volumes of the arsenic-containing feed (Roxarsone) suggest that may not be the case (shocking, we know).

What can you do? Buy a better bird.

While the critical step needed here is to ban arsenic in poultry feed, as Europe has done, poultry eaters can vote with our forks for clean water and safer foods. How? Simple:

  • Buy organic or antibiotic-free poultry (starting with your Thanksgiving turkey!), because neither is fed arsenic-laden antibiotics. As is so often the case, eating for your own health is a win for the environment, too.
  • Support state and federal bans on arsenic-laced feed.
  • Spread the word! When more people are aware and care, markets and policy changes happen faster.

Happy (arsenic free) Thanksgiving!

[Thanks to Flickr and minimalistphotography101 for the turkey pic]

By Lisa Frack

March 23, 2010

51113429_6f224bf0e4_m.jpgBy Alex Formuzis, EWG Communications Director

A Denver grandmother of eight, who happens to be a trained nutritionist, decided to see for herself just how effective the preservatives used in large segments of the U.S. food system actually are.

She left an untouched McDonald's Happy Meal on a shelf in her kitchen for 12 months and has just released photos of the result. As some might expect, the year-old meal of beef, bun and French fries looks hardly different a year after it was first purchased. Hollywood note: Those of you looking to dial back the years may want look into this a little more.

Even the flies didn't want it
The most revealing and somewhat scary part of this experiment was that she said the left-out food didn't attract a single fly or any other insect over the entire year. Flies swarm almost anything with an odor. They turn out in droves to hover over a dog pile but apparently had no interest in the kids' meal.

"I had the windows open many times, but flies and other insects just ignored the Happy Meal," said Joann Burso. "What does that tell you, if they can't be bothered with it?" She conceded to the website Mail Online that the arid climate where she lives in Colorado might have something to do with the Happy Meal's long "shelf life," but still...

A closer look inside that Happy Meal
So, what exactly is in the preservatives that make the Happy Meal the Dean Clark of fast food? Let's take a look.

The bun:
High fructose corn syrup - of course.
Sugar
Soybean oil
Calcium sulphate
Calcium carbonate
Wheat gluten
Ammonium sulphate
Ammonium chloride
Dough conditioners (whatever those are)
Stearoyl lactylate
Datem (again, no idea)
Ascorbic acid
Stearoyl lactylate
Azodicarbonamide
Mono- and diglycerides (not even going to try)
Ethoxylated monoglycerides
Monocalcium phosphate
Enzymes
Guar gum
Calcium peroxide
Calcium propionate and sodium propionate
Soy lecithin

The fries:
Hydrogenated soybean oil
Natural beef flavor (Don't ask)
Citric acid
Dextrose
Sodium acid pyrophosphate (to maintain color)
Dimethylpolysiloxane (added as an anti-foaming agent)

The "beef":
Supposedly 100 percent beef. Of course, it's undoubtedly not grass-fed beef, so much of it is actually corn. Almost half the corn grown in the United States goes to feeding cows and chickens.

I don't know about you, but I think I'll grab something with fewer than 29 ingredients for lunch today.

[Thanks to Flickr CC & Xurble for the smilin' meal]

By Lisa Frack

February 1, 2010

phpThumb.jpgWith green being the new black, there are more than a few environmental documentaries to choose from when popping that (not-in-the-microwave) popcorn.

To help you navigate the choices, EWG's very own Don Carr, press secretary and hard-hitting ag policy blogger, offers guidance on which to see. He screened them himself at this year's Sundance Film Festival to boil it down for us on Grist (trailers included). On my list are the ones Don highlights as "well-crafted, compelling films that address crucial environmental themes not yet in the public consciousness."

So find the film(s) for you and turn on the stove to start popping corn the old-fashioned way.

About that movie popcorn...
If you're ready to learn more and reduce your exposure to the perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) that line popcorn and other fast-food wrappers (among other things), get EWG's Guide to PFCs.

By Elaine Shannon

December 22, 2009

EWG staffers put our heads together to come up with this list of bad news environmental stories of the last decade that people might have missed. But there were plenty of big stories that hardly anyone could have missed, such as climate change. What's on your list of the biggest environmental stories of the last 10 years?

newstand_sml-2.jpg1. Secret Gas Drilling Chemical Almost Kills Colorado Nurse
Doctors ran into a medical mystery -- and a stone wall from industry -- when they tried to find what was in a gas drilling chemical that nearly killed a Colorado nurse. Aren't you glad that Congress exempted these "fracking" chemicals from regulation under the Safe Water Drinking Act?

2. Intersex Fish Turn Up All Over
Are you a boy or are you a girl? That's the question that scientists are asking as they study the organs of supposedly male fish from coast to coast and find eggs in many of them. The chief suspects: endocrine-disrupting pollutants that even in tiny amounts can mimic hormones and affect sexual development.

3. Prescription Drugs in Your Drinking Water
Take a swallow and call me in the morning. Antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones - they've all turned up in tests of drinking water around the country. Could there be health risks from decades of drinking water laced with combinations of potent drugs?

4. And Rocket Fuel, Too
Perchlorate -- the stuff is used in rocket fuel and explosives and turns up not just in water but also in milk, lettuce, other foods - and in our bodies. It's been linked to thyroid problems in pregnant women, newborns and infants. The EPA is reconsidering its earlier decision not to regulate it in water. Stand by.

5. Ethanol -- Not Just Bad Energy Policy
There are a lot of reasons to question the drive for biofuels, especially corn-based ethanol, but there has been much less attention paid to what it means for air pollution and health. For people who like to breathe clean air, the balance doesn't look promising.

6. Non-stick, No-Stain and No-Good
They were the miracle products that were supposed to make life easier - keeping spills from staining our couches and making it easy to clean our pots without scrubbing -- until it all went sour. Chemicals in the original Teflon and now off-the-market Scotchgard were linked to cancer and developmental problems. They have a way of polluting everything and they refuse to go away.

7. Monsanto Owns Corn (and also soybeans)
80% of the corn and 95% percent of the soybeans grown in America contain genes inserted by Monsanto scientists, and the company writes tough - and secret - licensing agreements to maintain control and lock out competitors. Now the Justice Department and some states are thinking these practices might violate anti-trust laws. Turnips, anyone?

8. Occupational Hazard: Microwave Popcorn
This fun food turned to be no fun for people who make it. A strange lung malady that sickened workers in plants that make microwave popcorn was traced to a widely used butter flavoring. And one popcorn-crazy consumer was felled, too. It took a while, but OSHA finally took a look, and the stuff is being phased out.

9. Dead (Zone) on Arrival
In the Gulf of Mexico, Chesapeake Bay and elsewhere, vast expanses of ocean have been turned into biological deserts as fertilizer runoff from farms washes downstream and nourish runaway algae growth, which deplete most of the oxygen when the tiny organisms die and decompose. The Gulf dead zone has more than doubled in size since the 1980s - accelerated by the boom in crops grown to make biofuels. In 2009, it was smaller than predicted, but more intense, in 2009.

10. The (Not So) Great Pacific Trash Gyre
It's hard to spot from the water or even from space, but an estimated 3.5 million tons of mostly plastic trash from all over the world floats just below the surface of the Pacific, swirling slowly around in an area of circular currents twice the size of Texas. It's devastating to birds and sea creatures that think the plastic bits are food. It's time to stop adding to the mess - and then see if there's any way to clean it up.

What stories top your list of the decade's biggest environmental news??